Wednesday, August 4, 2010
jumping ship
I've made the switch to wordpress.
Find me here http://fullandbye.wordpress.com/
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Kingston Burning
If you read no further, know that I am safe. Peace Corps always stresses that volunteer safety is their number one priority. While I have sometimes doubted the wisdom of specific safety policies (helmets while driving a donkey cart? Really?) The past few days have definitely ossified my faith in Peace Corps having their act together when situations get legitimately dicey.
And dicey they are indeed. News can gotten anywhere. For back story, the best journal article summarizing the situation (as of last week, before things got "hot") is this article here. Very comprehensive. Good reading too.
This story was published before the violence began. Since then there has been fighting between government security (military and constabulary force) and the private militia armed and paid by organized crime figures. Most of the major news outlets are on this story so information should be easy to come by.
Like most conflicts that make world press, this one is concentrated in a a few cities. There is a visceral tension in people's mood even in this bucolic outpost. But really, were it not for the media it would be hard to notice anything amiss throughout most of the country. Port Antonio remains peaceful, laid back, and pleasant. Moore Town remains quiet, beautiful, and friendly. When it comes down to it, farmers in the Rio Grande Valley (farmers everywhere, presumably) have other things to worry about.
I am not worried for myself at all. I am worried for my friends in the JDF.
My move from Port Royal could not have come at a more fortuitous time. When I was still in Port Royal, anytime I went to Kingston I had to travel right through the part of Kingston that is now the heart of this conflict. I met some wonderful and engaging people; taxi drivers, market ladies, hawkers, domino players, and buskers. I worry for these people too.
Updates as they come. Several people around the world--in Ghana, Israel, Seattle, Italy etc. have contacted me to ask about my safety. I am profoundly touched by the concern. It means a lot. I hope I have put your minds at ease. Anyone with further questions about me or about this situation is, of course, welcome to contact me privately off-list.
Tuesday will be the one-year anniversary of my shipping out from Seattle. The image from that 737 of Mt. Index and Lake Serene as we passed over the Cascades remains as clear in my mind as though it were yesterday. In a sense, it feels like yesterday.
Peace.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
roosters
I have news for you, urban dwellers who have never been around a cock in your life: Roosters crow whenever the hell they feel like it.
I actually think that roosters crow whenever their five functioning neurons manage to fire simultaneously and give roosters a "thought" (including the thought "Holy shit! I'm a rooster!).
But it is true that roosters crow a lot more at dawn. This is easily explained by my previous logic. I think that roosters are so dumb that by daybreak they have forgotten completely what dawn is so they think "holy shit! it's getting light outside!" and then once it is light they are surprised by pretty much everything they see; "Holy shit! Two sticks in some mud!" or "Holy shit! A pile of garbage!"
I am all for civil liberties. But after living in rooster land for a year already, I can really appreciate Seattle's ban on urban rooster keeping.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
irony
In the past this has led to some pretty amusing discoveries; such as the time I tried to write "guacamole" but my phone decided upon the term "hubbanoke". Not knowing what a "hubbanoke" is I nevertheless tried to use it in scrabble. It did not work. Apparently the nokia dictionary does not cut the scrabble mustard (or guacamole).
But it does now and again come up with a gem of irony.
Behold! The numeral combination that yields the word "pants" will, as the second option no less, also create the word "scots". The Scots of course are an ethnic minority in the British Isles known among other things for not wearing pants.
This gives me a sense of peace; the irony of the phone.
Monday, May 10, 2010
the captives
A recent slew of wall posts on my facebook account led a friend to observe that we now have the choice to either reveal almost nothing to acquaintances, or to reveal a whole lot more than perhaps should be revealed in one fell swoop with people we are just getting to know.
It is an interesting point. On the one hand, I doubt if my close friends could learn much by poring over the details of my facebook profile. But I also frequently "friend" people who I have just met but who I very much want to stay in contact with. In a few minutes examining my facebook profile, these people can learn lots of trivial things about me, and a handful of not trivial things about me. Before facebook, these trivial and non trivial things used to be revealed to a new friend slowly through the process of dialogue and mutual inquiry.
I guess the question is whether or not this really matters. I think it does. For all the poo-pooing that smalltalk gets, I think that smalltalk is actually kind of important in the process of making friends: You meet someone, you smalltalk. After you smalltalk a little, you move into bigger and more substantive topics of conversation, and after you know someone a while longer you might feel comfortable getting into the lengthy sorts of dialogues that reveal some really complex facet of your being. Isn't this the process of making friends? I wonder if we interact with people differently now that we can largely circumvent that process of discovery. I no longer need to engage in a series of conversations with a new friend to discover what their taste in music or art is, or how they like to spend their freetime, or even how they feel about divisive political issues. Shit, I can even see if they are married, single, or in an "it's complicated" situation.
In speaking with this friend it dawned upon me that maybe we have lost something really valuable to facebook. Have we lost the process of discovery? Have we lost an essential element of the process of making friends? I am reminded of the series of scupltures in the Michaelangelo museum in Florence. As you approach the statue of "David", on either side of the corridor are some studies that Michaelangelo never finished. They are haunting and beautiful, these forms forever trapped in the marble. But isn't the process of making a friend in large part the process of mutually chipping away at each other's exteriors until you reveal and let yourself be revealed? Isn't this what dialogue is, really? And isn't dialogue the root of friendship?
I worry that facebook has made public identity too cartesian, too reductionistic. There is really nothing on my facebook that I consider very private at all, but I still think that something of human interaction is lost when we can get by with learning the details of someones life through an itemized list without going through the process of asking questions and exchanging bits of information to reveal the form underneath the formless exterior.
Monday, May 3, 2010
skipping stones
Hard to watch these ripples fade. But I'm definitely excited to skip some more stones.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
1. Nothing and no one is immune from criticism.
2. Everyone involved in a controversy has an intellectual responsibility to inform himself of the available facts.
3. Criticism should be directed first to policies, and against persons only when they are responsible for policies, and against their motives or purposes only when there is some independent evidence of their character.
4. Because certain words are legally permissible, they are not therefore morally permissible.
5. Before impugning an opponent’s motives, even when they legitimately may be impugned, answer his arguments.
6. Do not treat an opponent of a policy as if he were therefore a personal enemy of the country or a concealed enemy of democracy.
7. Since a good cause may be defended by bad arguments, after answering the bad arguments for another’s position present positive evidence for your own.
8. Do not hesitate to admit lack of knowledge or to suspend judgment if evidence is not decisive either way.
9. Only in pure logic and mathematics, not in human affairs, can one demonstrate that something is strictly impossible. Because something is logically possible, it is not therefore probable. “It is not impossible” is a preface to an irrelevant statement about human affairs. The question is always one of the balance of probabilities. And the evidence for probabilities must include more than abstract possibilities.
10. The cardinal sin, when we are looking for truth of fact or wisdom of policy, is refusal to discuss, or action which blocks discussion.
I wish these were prominently displayed somewhere in each house of congress.
nicknames
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
the axis of ambition and the axis of crazy.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
good heavens
Sunday, January 17, 2010
On a specimen collection dive on friday (coral mostly, but also some invertebrates) I saw a sea turtle. The turtle was maybe 20' deep and was hiding under a ledge in the reef. It was maybe 1 meter in diameter and I later was able to identify it as a green turtle. So gorgeous. Nature's penchant for color and pattern is best displayed in tropical ecosystems. Simply amazing. Peace Corps life can be trying at times, but moments like that make up for every frustration.
Book thoughts.
I just recently reread A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius and I enjoyed it much more this time. I first read that book when in between my second and third years of college, and I really did not get it. But the book is really a book about the compromises to youth that Dave Eggers made on account of finding himself suddenly a parent. The context is so much clearer now. Strangely, the book is about Eggers' life between the ages of 21 and 27 and these ages are likewise the ages of my first and second readings. Now that I have experienced life post-college and now that 25 does not seem ancient (at 21 I could hardly imagine being 25) the experiences recounted in the book are so much more relatable. What is interesting is that they are not relatable because they are similar to my experiences, but because now I can see what Dave Eggers felt cheated out of. I was so focused on finishing college when I first read the book, that the thought of being post-college with a sibling sidekick just did not seem that weird. Now I can look back and say with full confidence that the past five years that I have treasured so much for the independence and self-definition they afforded me would be gone were I to find myself in Eggers' situation.
Currently rereading Tropic of Cancer. So good. This book I read only four years ago or so, but on this reading I appreciate it differently as well. I think that living abroad is part of this difference in perspective. One of the strange things about living overseas is that I am frequently surprised by who my friends are. It is easy to bond with other expats but sometimes I wonder to myself "would I really be friends with these people in any other situation?". I think Miller frequently asked himself the same thing living in Paris. Incidentally, this question is also at the heart of the film "The Breakfast Club". Not sure where I am going with this line of reasoning.
But what I am really enjoying about this reading of Tropic of Cancer is the historicality of the book. I take it for granted that Henry Miller was more prone to discussing matters of the flesh than most of his (or our) contemporaries. But what makes the book so delightful is to revel in the incongrouity between it and pretty much all other english language (or photographic) representations of life between the two world wars. Not counting pics of the depression era destitute, people looked so damn classy in 1932! And the Hays Production Code further adds to the sanitized view I have of this era. So Miller's work is this wonderful little time capsule that assures me that despite their clothes, and despite the cinematic representation of their time, people then (at least Miller and the people in his circle) were every bit as debaucherous as anything I can imagine now. I take comfort in this fact.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
earthquake in haiti
I am fine.
I am not sure if I felt the earthquake or not. I was in the water up to my waist at the time, and had been in the water and off and on boats all day so I was sorta sea-leggy. I do know that I noticed waves but could not find a ship that kicked up the wake, I did not think much of it. There was a tsunami warning for the North side of the island (I am South side) but it expired pretty quickly.
That said, the situation is Haiti is really bad. Now is a good time to donate. I have not heard anything about whether Peace Corps Response (formerly Crisis Corps) will go and help with the reconstruction effort. Hopefully yes, but these things take time. If there is any way for PC Jamaica volunteers to work on this effort, I will definitely try to get there.
Otherwise. Work is going well. I am really busy and we open the biodiversity centre in less than two weeks. I am learning a lot about aquarium chemistry and am getting a lot better at managing the various tanks. Generally happy, generally productive.
I reread A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. Currently rereading Tropic of Cancer. I will probably write a post on this experience as well.
To sum up
State of Haiti: Disaster.
State of Jamaica: No More Disastrous Than Usual.
State of Raz: Pretty happy. Definitely ready to go home and bathe.
State of Clothing: Trousers filthy. Keens smelling REALLY bad (what do I do about this? Any suggestions?)
Current Time: 17:35
Current Weather: Low 80's, slight southeasterly breeze.